Water conflict through the lens of hydro-hegemony
This paper explores the tensions between Israel and Palestine in their ongoing water conflict, and assesses the use of international law as a remedy for peacebuilding. I argue that the water conflict between Israel and Palestine cannot currently be alleviated through the use of the international legal system. Initially, a background of the water-related histories and geographies of both states provides insights into the skewed development of each. Then, I first argue that International Water Law (IWL), is not sufficient due to the low global signatory coverage, use of vague language, and lack of adaptive flexibility. Second, I argue that the 1995 Oslo Accords are a major obstacle in facilitating Palestinian development of the water and sanitation sector, thus also hindering cooperation with Israel. Third, I claim that in the water conflict between these two States, hydro-hegemony is more influential than international law. Finally, to accommodate the future needs of an expanding population, I explore prospects of the conflict by offering suggestions of IWL development, climate change accountability, and peacebuilding efforts.
